Exam Details

  • Exam Code
    :301B
  • Exam Name
    :BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot
  • Certification
    :F5 Certifications
  • Vendor
    :F5
  • Total Questions
    :209 Q&As
  • Last Updated
    :Mar 30, 2025

F5 F5 Certifications 301B Questions & Answers

  • Question 81:

    An LTM Specialist configures two LTM devices in a high-availability pair with trusts established and device groups configured properly using network failover. After several months, the LTM Specialist notices that changes made to one LTM device do NOT cause the synchronization status to update to "changes pending," and this device does NOT synchronize with the device group.

    Which two steps should the LTM Specialist take to identify the issue? (Choose two.)

    A. Verify that NTP is synchronized.

    B. Verify the network connectivity between the devices.

    C. Verify that the devices are not using self-signed certificates.

    D. Verify that ConfigSync is using the management IP address.

    E. Verify that port lockdown on the ConfigSync interface is set to allow port 1026.

  • Question 82:

    An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue where one LTM device in a three LTM device group is failing to synchronize after a synchronize to group command is issued. The LTM Specialist verifies there are no packet filters, port lock down, or network issues preventing the connection.

    What are two reasons the synchronization group is having issues? (Choose two.)

    A. Certificates expired on all of the peer LTM devices.

    B. Certificates stored for the device trusts on all of the peer LTM devices are corrupted.

    C. Admin passwords changed on one of the peer LTM devices that are able to synchronize.

    D. Admin password changed on the LTM device NOT receiving the synchronized configurations.

    E. Certificates stored for the device trusts on the LTM device NOT receiving the configuration are corrupted.

  • Question 83:

    An LTM Specialist has just manually failed the active LTM device over to the standby LTM device. The LTM Specialist notices the newly active LTM device is NOT currently receiving traffic. The LTM Specialist verifies the newly active device is responding to ARP but still no traffic is hitting the virtual servers. The LTM Specialist also notices that the virtual servers eventually start responding.

    What should be added to the configuration to resolve the problem?

    A. vlan failsafe

    B. floating self IP

    C. network failover

    D. MAC masquerading

    E. connection mirroring

  • Question 84:

    A failover event is recorded in the log messages:

    Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 01140029:5: HA proc_running tmm fails action is go offline and down links. Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0050:5: Sod requests links down. Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0054:5: Offline for traffic group /Common/traffic-group-1. Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c003e:5: Offline Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice logger: /usr/bin/tmipsecd --tmmcount 4 ==> /usr/bin/bigstart stop racoon Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP info lacpd[5502]: 01160016:6: Failover event detected. (Switchboard failsafe disabled while offline) Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP err bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0010:3: Failover event detected. Marking external interfaces down. bsx.c(3633) Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP info bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0015:6: Link: 1.1 is DOWN Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143c:5: Connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 has been removed Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 port 6699

    What is the cause of the failover?

    A. TMM failed, and VLAN fail-safe initiated the failover.

    B. TMM failed, and system fail-safe initiated the failover.

    C. Loss of connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 initiated the failover.

    D. A switchboard failure caused system fail-safe to initiate the failover.

  • Question 85:

    While investigating the cause of a device failover, an LTM Specialist discovers the following events in /var/log/ltm:

    01010029:5: Clock advanced by 518 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 505 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 590 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 568 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 1681 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 6584 ticks 01140029:5: HA daemon_heartbeat tmm fails action is failover and restart. 010c0026:5: Failover condition, active attempting to go standby.

    Which issue caused the failover?

    A. NTP being out of sync

    B. TMM being descheduled

    C. VLAN Fail-safe heartbeats

    D. HA missing heartbeat packets

  • Question 86:

    A high-availability (HA) pair configuration uses only the hardwire serial cable connection to determine device state. A power outage occurs to the PDU powering the active unit. The standby unit takes over the active role as expected.

    How is the peer unit able to determine the active unit is unavailable?

    A. voltage loss on serial cable

    B. no data stream received on serial port

    C. no response on management interface

    D. no heartbeat packets received on self IPs

  • Question 87:

    In preparation for a maintenance task, an LTM Specialist performs a "Force to Standby" on LTM device Unit 1. LTM device Unit 2 becomes active as expected. The maintenance task requires the reboot of Unit 1. Shortly after the reboot is complete, the LTM Specialist discovers that Unit 1 has become active and Unit 2 has returned to standby.

    What would cause this behavior?

    A. Unit 1 is set with the redundancy state preference of active in devices groups.

    B. Unit 1 is set with the redundancy state preference of active in high availability.

    C. A traffic group is configured with Auto Failback, and Unit 1 is the default device.

    D. A device group is configured with Auto Failback, and Unit 1 is the default device.

  • Question 88:

    Given LTM device ltm log:

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5: semaphore mcpd.running(1) held

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5:

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 warning promptstatusd[3695]: 01460005:4: mcpd.running(1) held, wait for mcpd

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info sod[3925]: 010c0009:6: Lost connection to mcpd - reestablishing.

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0004:3: Lost connection with MCP: 16908291 ... Exiting bsx_connect.cpp(174)

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: MCP Exit Status

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: Info: LACP stats (time now:1348717868) : no traffic

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0014:6: Exiting...

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err lind[3842]: 013c0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd - connection lost

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice bigd[3837]: 01060110:5: Lost connection to mcpd with error 16908291, will reinit connection.

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error ''

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0001:3: Connection to mcpd failed with error '011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error '''

    Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err csyncd[3851]: 013b0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd - connection lost

    .............skipping more logs.....

    Sep 26 20:51:30 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running bcm56xxd is now responding.

    Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running mcpd is now responding.

    Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 010c0018:5: Standby

    Which daemon failed?

    A. promptstatusd

    B. mcpd

    C. sod

    D. bcm56xxd

    E. lind

  • Question 89:

    An active/standby pair of LTM devices deployed with network failover are working as desired. After external personnel perform maintenance on the network, the LTM devices are active/active rather than active/standby. No changes were made on the LTM devices during the network maintenance.

    Which two actions would help determine the cause of the malfunction? (Choose two.)

    A. checking that the configurations are synchronized

    B. checking the configuration of the VLAN used for failover

    C. checking the configuration of the VLAN used for mirroring

    D. checking the open ports in firewalls between the LTM devices

    E. checking synchronization of system clocks among the network devices

  • Question 90:

    The active LTM device in a high-availability (HA) pair performs a failover at the same time the network team reports an outage of a switch on the network. Which two items could have caused the failover event? (Choose two.)

    A. a VLAN fail-safe setting

    B. a monitor on a pool in an HA group

    C. the standby LTM that was rebooted

    D. an Auditor role that has access to the GUI

    E. the standby LTM that lost connectivity on the failover VLAN

  • Tips on How to Prepare for the Exams

    Nowadays, the certification exams become more and more important and required by more and more enterprises when applying for a job. But how to prepare for the exam effectively? How to prepare for the exam in a short time with less efforts? How to get a ideal result and how to find the most reliable resources? Here on Vcedump.com, you will find all the answers. Vcedump.com provide not only F5 exam questions, answers and explanations but also complete assistance on your exam preparation and certification application. If you are confused on your 301B exam preparations and F5 certification application, do not hesitate to visit our Vcedump.com to find your solutions here.